• Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Our Team
    • Legal Counsel
  • Cookie Policy (US)
Menu
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Our Team
    • Legal Counsel
  • Cookie Policy (US)
Subscribe
April 2, 2011
Portrait of Wally, Egon Scheile
Source: MJH

Larry Kaye discussed the circumstances under which Egon Schiele’s ‘Portrait of Walli’ had been seized under orders of the then-District of Attorney of Manhattan, Robert Morgenthau, in early January 1998 from an exhibit of Schiele’s works held at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in New York City.

According to Larry, the claimant family represented by the late Henry Bondi, on behalf of his deceased aunt, Ruth Jarai Bondi, had petitioned Morgenthau’s office to intervene in the squabble between his family, the Museum of Modern Art, and the Leopold Foundation, current owner of ‘Walli.’

Larry was unaware of the role played by the Holocaust Art Restitution Project (HARP) in the events leading up to the seizure of ‘Walli’.  Indeed, Henry Bondi had sought HARP’s help in November-December 1997 via Willi Korte, a veteran German-educated legal and historical researcher and investigator on looted art issues whom Henry Bondi had retained to flesh out the provenance of the ‘Portrait of Walli.’

HARP conducted its own research and inquired into the legal circumstances under which ‘the Portrait of Walli’ had entered the United States.  It turns out that MOMA had made a number of mistakes both at the Federal and State levels which exposed it to possible legal action.  HARP recorded these flaws and transmitted them to Robert Morgenthau’s office in the hope that it could use them to act on behalf of the Bondi family.  Previous attempts by HARP’s chairperson, Ori Z. Soltes, then director of the B’nai B’rith Klutznick Museum in Washington, DC, to open up a dialogue with MOMA over the ownership of ‘Walli’ had been met by blunt dismissals and invitations to sue MOMA in order to keep the painting from being returned to Vienna, Austria.

As Larry pointed out, the rest is history.

Share
cameronav23
cameronav23

Related posts

November 19, 2019

Backdrop to the 20th anniversary celebration of the existence of the CIVS


Read more
November 5, 2018

Washington Principle #10: A Critique


Read more
August 8, 2018

MoMA’s dalliances with the two portraits of Max Hermann Neisse by Georg Grosz


Read more
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
Preferences
{title} {title} {title}